A new arena's tiered seating: rows, capacity and ticket income
1.2 Arithmetic sequences and series1.1 Standard form2.1 Equations of straight lines, parallel and perpendicular lines1.3 Geometric sequences and seriesSL
The lower tier of seating in a new indoor arena has 40 rows. Row 1, nearest the court, has 64 seats, and every row after that has 6 more seats than the row in front of it.
Let \(u_n\) be the number of seats in row \(n\) of the lower tier. Figure 1 shows \(u_n\) for the first 10 rows.
Find the number of seats in row 25.
Show solution
| \(u_{25}=64+(25-1)\times6\) | M1 | Substitution into \(u_n=u_1+(n-1)d\) with \(u_1=64,\ d=6\). |
| 208 | A1 |
Answer: 208 seats
Find the total number of seats in the lower tier.
Show solution
| \(S_{40}=\frac{40}{2}\left(2\times64+39\times6\right)\) | M1 | Or \(u_{40}=298\) and \(S_{40}=\frac{40}{2}(64+298)\). |
| \(7240\) | A1 |
Answer: 7240 seats
Show that the total number of seats in the first \(n\) rows is \(3n^{2}+61n\).
Show solution
| \(S_n=\frac{n}{2}\left(2\times64+(n-1)\times6\right)\) | M1 | Correct substitution into the sum formula. |
| \(=\frac{n}{2}(6n+122)\) or \(=64n+3n^{2}-3n\) | A1 | A correct intermediate simplified form must be seen. |
| \(S_n=3n^{2}+61n\) | AG |
For a concert, 6000 tickets are sold for the lower tier. The spectators are seated from row 1 backwards, and each row is filled completely before the next row is used.
Find the number of rows that are needed to seat all 6000 spectators.
Show solution
| \(3n^{2}+61n\ge6000\) | M1 | Accept an equation \(3n^{2}+61n=6000\), or a table of values of \(S_n\). |
| \(n=35.6957\ldots\) or \(S_{35}=5810\) and \(S_{36}=6084\) | A1 | Ignore the negative root \(n=-56.03\). |
| 36 rows | A1 | Must be a whole number. 35 or 35.7 scores A0. |
Answer: 36 rows
The points in Figure 1 lie on a straight line with equation \(y=mx+c\).
Find the value of \(m\) and the value of \(c\).
Show solution
| gradient from two points, e.g. \(m=\frac{118-64}{10-1}\), or \(u_n=64+6(n-1)\) | M1 | |
| \(m=6,\ c=58\) | A1 | Accept \(y=6x+58\). |
Answer: \(m=6,\ c=58\)
Interpret, in context, the value of \(m\). Explain why the point \((0,\ c)\) is not part of the graph of \(u_n\).
Show solution
| \(m\) is the number of extra seats in each row compared with the row in front of it | R1 | Accept "the common difference: each row has 6 more seats". |
| there is no row 0: \(n\) must be a positive integer, so 58 is not the number of seats in any row | R1 | Accept a reason based on the graph being separate points with \(n\ge1\). |
Every seat in the lower tier is sold for each of the 38 home matches of the season. The mean price of a lower-tier ticket is €46.50.
Find the total income from lower-tier tickets for the season. Give your answer in the form \(a\times10^{k}\), where \(1\le a\lt10\) and \(k\in\mathbb{Z}\), to three significant figures.
Show solution
| \(38\times7240\times46.50\ (=12\,793\,080)\) | M1 | Allow ECF from (b). |
| €\(1.28\times10^{7}\) | A1 | Award A0 for 12 800 000 or 1.28E7 written in calculator style. |
Answer: €\(1.28\times10^{7}\)
The upper tier will have 50 rows, and row 1 of the upper tier will also have 64 seats. Two patterns are being compared.
- Pattern A: each row has 6 more seats than the row in front, so row \(n\) has \(u_n\) seats.
- Pattern B: each row has 4% more seats than the row in front, so row \(n\) has \(v_n=64\times1.04^{\,n-1}\) seats, rounded to the nearest whole number.
Find the number of seats in row 25 for pattern B.
Show solution
| \(64\times1.04^{24}\ (=164.05\ldots)\) | M1 | Exponent \(25\) (giving 170.6) scores M0. |
| 164 | A1 |
Answer: 164 seats
Find the first row in which pattern B has more seats than pattern A.
Show solution
| attempt to compare \(64\times1.04^{\,n-1}\) with \(6n+58\), e.g. a table of values, graphs or an equation solver | M1 | Rounded or unrounded values of \(v_n\) may be used. |
| \(v_{40}=295\lt u_{40}=298\) and \(v_{41}=307\gt u_{41}=304\), or intersection at \(n=40.4\ldots\) | A1 | Both rows 40 and 41 must be seen if a table is used. |
| row 41 | A1 |
Answer: row 41
In rows 2 to 40, pattern A has more seats than pattern B. Explain why pattern B grows faster than pattern A for large values of \(n\).
Show solution
| in pattern A the increase from one row to the next is always the same, 6 seats | R1 | |
| in pattern B the increase is 4% of the previous row, which gets larger as the rows get longer; it is more than 6 once a row has more than 150 seats, so B eventually overtakes A | R1 | Accept: geometric (exponential) growth with \(r\gt1\) eventually exceeds any arithmetic (linear) growth, with a reason. |
Show full solution
| Working | Mark | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Part (a) | ||
| \(u_{25}=64+(25-1)\times6\) | M1 | Substitution into \(u_n=u_1+(n-1)d\) with \(u_1=64,\ d=6\). |
| 208 | A1 | |
| Part (b) | ||
| \(S_{40}=\frac{40}{2}\left(2\times64+39\times6\right)\) | M1 | Or \(u_{40}=298\) and \(S_{40}=\frac{40}{2}(64+298)\). |
| \(7240\) | A1 | |
| Part (c) | ||
| \(S_n=\frac{n}{2}\left(2\times64+(n-1)\times6\right)\) | M1 | Correct substitution into the sum formula. |
| \(=\frac{n}{2}(6n+122)\) or \(=64n+3n^{2}-3n\) | A1 | A correct intermediate simplified form must be seen. |
| \(S_n=3n^{2}+61n\) | AG | |
| Part (d) | ||
| \(3n^{2}+61n\ge6000\) | M1 | Accept an equation \(3n^{2}+61n=6000\), or a table of values of \(S_n\). |
| \(n=35.6957\ldots\) or \(S_{35}=5810\) and \(S_{36}=6084\) | A1 | Ignore the negative root \(n=-56.03\). |
| 36 rows | A1 | Must be a whole number. 35 or 35.7 scores A0. |
| Part (e)(i) | ||
| gradient from two points, e.g. \(m=\frac{118-64}{10-1}\), or \(u_n=64+6(n-1)\) | M1 | |
| \(m=6,\ c=58\) | A1 | Accept \(y=6x+58\). |
| Part (e)(ii) | ||
| \(m\) is the number of extra seats in each row compared with the row in front of it | R1 | Accept "the common difference: each row has 6 more seats". |
| there is no row 0: \(n\) must be a positive integer, so 58 is not the number of seats in any row | R1 | Accept a reason based on the graph being separate points with \(n\ge1\). |
| Part (f) | ||
| \(38\times7240\times46.50\ (=12\,793\,080)\) | M1 | Allow ECF from (b). |
| €\(1.28\times10^{7}\) | A1 | Award A0 for 12 800 000 or 1.28E7 written in calculator style. |
| Part (g)(i) | ||
| \(64\times1.04^{24}\ (=164.05\ldots)\) | M1 | Exponent \(25\) (giving 170.6) scores M0. |
| 164 | A1 | |
| Part (g)(ii) | ||
| attempt to compare \(64\times1.04^{\,n-1}\) with \(6n+58\), e.g. a table of values, graphs or an equation solver | M1 | Rounded or unrounded values of \(v_n\) may be used. |
| \(v_{40}=295\lt u_{40}=298\) and \(v_{41}=307\gt u_{41}=304\), or intersection at \(n=40.4\ldots\) | A1 | Both rows 40 and 41 must be seen if a table is used. |
| row 41 | A1 | |
| Part (g)(iii) | ||
| in pattern A the increase from one row to the next is always the same, 6 seats | R1 | |
| in pattern B the increase is 4% of the previous row, which gets larger as the rows get longer; it is more than 6 once a row has more than 150 seats, so B eventually overtakes A | R1 | Accept: geometric (exponential) growth with \(r\gt1\) eventually exceeds any arithmetic (linear) growth, with a reason. |
Answers: (a) 208 seats · (b) 7240 seats · (d) 36 rows · (e)(i) \(m=6,\ c=58\) · (f) €\(1.28\times10^{7}\) · (g)(i) 164 seats · (g)(ii) row 41
Common error (d) Rounding \(n=35.7\) down to 35 gives only 5810 seats, which is not enough. When a total must reach a target, take the next whole number up and check it with the sum formula.
Exam tip (g)(iii) Comparing an arithmetic and a geometric sequence, look at the step between terms: \(d\) is fixed, but \(u_{n+1}-u_n=(r-1)u_n\) grows with \(u_n\).