S1.6 The Normal distribution
⤓ Presentation⤓ PowerPointPresentation: opens offline in any browser, simulations live. PowerPoint: editable.
AS content (Statistics 1, specification section 6.1); a scientific calculator and the printed tables are all you need.
What this page covers
7 points
- The Normal distribution \(N(\mu,\sigma^2)\): its bell shape, its symmetry about the mean, and what \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\) do to the curve
- Standardising with \(Z=\dfrac{X-\mu}{\sigma}\) and the standard Normal distribution \(Z\sim N(0,1^2)\)
- Reading the table of \(\Phi(z)=P(Z\lt z)\), including negative values of \(z\) by symmetry
- Probabilities above, below and between values for any Normal variable, including conditional probabilities and independent repeats
- Working backwards with the percentage points table: the value with a given probability above or below it
- Finding an unknown mean or an unknown standard deviation from one probability
- Finding the mean and the standard deviation together from two probabilities (simultaneous equations)
In one minute
6 points
- \(X\sim N(\mu,\sigma^2)\) is a bell-shaped, symmetrical distribution centred on the mean \(\mu\); the second number is the variance, so the standard deviation is its square root.
- Standardise: \(z=\dfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma}\) counts how many standard deviations \(x\) is from the mean, and then \(P(X\lt x)=\Phi(z)\).
- Symmetry: \(P(Z\gt z)=1-\Phi(z)\) and \(\Phi(-z)=1-\Phi(z)\).
- Backwards: from a probability find \(z\) (percentage points table, or the \(\Phi\) table read in reverse), then \(x=\mu+z\sigma\).
- Unknown \(\mu\) or \(\sigma\): each given probability gives one equation \(\dfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma}=z\); two unknowns need two such equations.
- Use \(z\) to 2 d.p. with the \(\Phi\) table, quote table values to 4 d.p., and give final probabilities to 3 s.f. A calculator value is just as acceptable.
Contents
13 sections
- What does a Normal distribution look like?
- How do you standardise a Normal variable?
- How do you read the Φ(z) table?
- How do you find probabilities for any Normal variable?
- How do you find a value from a probability?
- How do you find an unknown mean or standard deviation?
- How do you find the mean and the standard deviation together?
- Exam tips for S1.6
- Common misconceptions
- How this topic connects
- Key formulae
- Check your understanding
- Specification checklist
What does a Normal distribution look like?
Weigh a few hundred apples from one orchard, or time the same bus journey every morning for a year. The values pile up around a typical value and become rarer the further you go from it, in either direction, at about the same rate. A histogram of such data, drawn with narrow classes, looks like a bell. The Normal distribution is the smooth model of that bell. It is used for continuous quantities: lengths of manufactured parts, masses of fruit, journey times, reaction times.
Several facts follow straight from the shape, and you will use them in almost every question:
- The curve is symmetrical about \(\mu\), so mean = median = mode = \(\mu\), and \(P(X\lt\mu)=P(X\gt\mu)=0.5\).
- Probabilities are areas under the curve, and the total area is 1.
- The curve never touches the axis, but values more than 3 standard deviations from the mean are very rare.
- For a continuous variable \(P(X=a)=0\): a single value has no width, so no area. Hence \(P(X\lt a)\) and \(P(X\le a)\) are the same number.
Changing \(\mu\) slides the curve along the axis without changing its shape. Changing \(\sigma\) changes the spread: doubling \(\sigma\) makes the curve twice as wide and half as tall, so that the total area stays 1. This is why you cannot compare two Normal curves by height alone — a flatter curve is not "less likely", it is just more spread out.
Whatever the values of \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\), about 68.3% of the distribution lies within one standard deviation of the mean, 95.4% within two and 99.7% within three. These percentages are worth knowing as a sense check rather than as a method:
- A value 2 standard deviations above the mean has only about 2.3% of the distribution above it, so a tail probability beyond \(z=2\) should come out small.
- They also tell you when a Normal model is not suitable. If a quantity cannot be negative but \(\mu-2\sigma\) is well below zero, a Normal model gives a noticeable probability to impossible values.
Reading \(X\sim N(50,16)\) as "standard deviation 16". The second parameter is the variance, so \(\sigma=\sqrt{16}=4\). Writing the distribution as \(N(50,4^2)\) avoids the slip.
How do you standardise a Normal variable?
There are infinitely many Normal distributions, one for each pair \(\mu,\sigma\), but only one of them has printed tables: the standard Normal distribution \(Z\sim N(0,1^2)\), with mean 0 and standard deviation 1. The trick is that every Normal variable can be turned into \(Z\). Subtract the mean, so the centre moves to 0; then divide by the standard deviation, so the spread becomes 1.
The \(z\)-value of \(x\) has a simple meaning: it is the number of standard deviations that \(x\) lies above the mean. A negative \(z\) means below the mean. Rearranged, the same link reads \(x=\mu+z\sigma\), which is the form you need when you work backwards from a probability.
Standardising relabels the axis without changing any area. Take cucumber lengths \(X\sim N(30,2.5^2)\) in cm. The value 33 is \(3\div2.5=1.2\) standard deviations above the mean, so \(P(X\gt33)\) is exactly the same area as \(P(Z\gt1.2)\). The two figures below have the same shape and the same shaded proportion; only the numbers on the axis differ.
How do you read the Φ(z) table?
The printed table gives \(\Phi(z)=P(Z\lt z)\), the area to the left of \(z\), for \(z\ge0\) in steps of 0.01. Round \(z\) to 2 d.p. before you look it up. Every other area comes from that one table by two ideas: the total area is 1, and the curve is symmetrical about 0. The method is always the same — draw the curve, shade the area you want, and decide which rule matches the picture.
| You want | Use | Why |
|---|---|---|
| \(P(Z\lt a)\), \(a\gt0\) | \(\Phi(a)\) | straight from the table |
| \(P(Z\gt a)\) | \(1-\Phi(a)\) | total area is 1 |
| \(P(Z\lt -a)\) | \(1-\Phi(a)\) | symmetry: the left tail beyond \(-a\) equals the right tail beyond \(a\) |
| \(P(Z\gt -a)\) | \(\Phi(a)\) | symmetry |
| \(P(a\lt Z\lt b)\) | \(\Phi(b)-\Phi(a)\) | area to the left of \(b\) minus the area to the left of \(a\) |
The random variable \(Z\sim N(0,1^2)\). Find (a) \(P(Z\lt1.23)\), (b) \(P(Z\gt0.4)\), (c) \(P(Z\lt-1.8)\), (d) \(P(-0.5\lt Z\lt1.2)\).
(a) Straight from the table: \(P(Z\lt1.23)=\Phi(1.23)=\) 0.8907
(b) The area to the right is 1 minus the area to the left: \(1-\Phi(0.40)=1-0.6554=\) 0.3446
(c) The left tail beyond −1.8 equals the right tail beyond 1.8: \(1-\Phi(1.80)=1-0.9641=\) 0.0359
(d) \(\Phi(1.2)-\Phi(-0.5)\), with \(\Phi(-0.5)=1-\Phi(0.5)\): \(0.8849-(1-0.6915)=0.8849-0.3085=\) 0.5764
These come straight from the table, so the 4 d.p. table values are the answers; to 3 s.f. they are 0.891, 0.345, 0.0359 and 0.576.
How do you find probabilities for any Normal variable?
For a variable that is not already standard, add one step in front of the table work. The full method is:
- Write the probability in terms of \(X\).
- Sketch the curve, mark the mean and shade the area you want.
- Standardise each boundary.
- Use the table rules from the previous section.
Write the standardising step out in full, for example \(P(X\gt33)=P\!\left(Z\gt\frac{33-30}{2.5}\right)=P(Z\gt1.2)\). This line carries the method, and it shows anyone reading your work that you divided by \(\sigma\) and not by \(\sigma^2\).
Two further ideas from S1 probability often appear in the same question. For "at least one of …" or "all three …", find the single probability first and then combine with the multiplication rule for independent events. For a conditional probability use \(P(A\mid B)=\dfrac{P(A\cap B)}{P(B)}\). With Normal tails, \(A\cap B\) is usually just the smaller tail: if a value is above 68, it is certainly above 60.
The length \(X\) cm of a cucumber from a greenhouse is modelled by \(X\sim N(30,2.5^2)\). Find (a) \(P(X\gt33)\), (b) \(P(27\lt X\lt34)\).
(a) Standardise: \(P(X\gt33)=P\!\left(Z\gt\frac{33-30}{2.5}\right)=P(Z\gt1.2)\). Then \(1-\Phi(1.20)=1-0.8849=0.1151=\) 0.115 (3 s.f.)
(b) Standardise both ends: \(P\!\left(\frac{27-30}{2.5}\lt Z\lt\frac{34-30}{2.5}\right)=P(-1.2\lt Z\lt1.6)\). Then \(\Phi(1.6)-\Phi(-1.2)=0.9452-(1-0.8849)=0.9452-0.1151=0.8301=\) 0.830 (3 s.f.)
The mass \(M\) grams of an egg from a farm is modelled by \(M\sim N(62,4^2)\). An egg is graded "large" if its mass is more than 68 g. (a) Find the proportion of eggs that are large. (b) An egg is known to have a mass of more than 60 g. Find the probability that it is large. (c) Two eggs are chosen at random. Find the probability that at least one of them is large.
(a) \(P(M\gt68)=P\!\left(Z\gt\frac{68-62}{4}\right)=P(Z\gt1.5)=1-0.9332=\) 0.0668
(b) Every egg over 68 g is also over 60 g, so the intersection is just \(P(M\gt68)\). \(P(M\gt60)=P(Z\gt-0.5)=\Phi(0.5)=0.6915\), so \[P(M\gt68\mid M\gt60)=\frac{0.0668}{0.6915}=\] 0.0966 (3 s.f.)
(c) "At least one" \(=1-P(\text{neither})\), and the eggs are independent: \(1-0.9332^2=\) 0.129 (3 s.f.)
For \(M\sim N(62,16)\), \(z=\dfrac{68-62}{4}\), not \(\dfrac{68-62}{16}\). A \(z\)-value that seems far too small for a value that is clearly in the tail is the warning sign.
How do you find a value from a probability?
Now the area is given and the boundary is unknown. Reverse the steps: find the \(z\)-value first, then convert it to \(x\) with \(x=\mu+z\sigma\).
There are two ways to find \(z\). The percentage points table gives the \(z\)-value with a stated probability \(p\) above it, \(P(Z\gt z)=p\), for \(p=0.5,\ 0.4,\ 0.3,\ 0.2,\ 0.15,\ 0.1,\ 0.05,\ 0.025,\ 0.01,\ 0.005,\ 0.001,\ 0.0005\). For example \(p=0.05\) gives \(z=1.6449\). If your probability is in that list, use it: the values are more accurate than reading the \(\Phi\) table backwards. Otherwise, read the \(\Phi\) table in reverse: find the probability inside the body of the table and read off \(z\). If it falls between two entries, use the nearer one — no interpolation is needed.
| \(p=P(Z\gt z)\) | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.025 | 0.01 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| \(z\) | 0.5244 | 0.8416 | 1.2816 | 1.6449 | 1.9600 | 2.3263 |
The sign of \(z\) is the step that goes wrong most often. A value in the lower part of the distribution has a negative \(z\). Sketch first: if the shaded area to the left of the boundary is less than 0.5, the boundary is below the mean and \(z\lt0\).
The time \(T\) seconds for a kettle to boil a full load of water is modelled by \(T\sim N(240,15^2)\). Find (a) the time exceeded by 5% of boils, (b) the time below which 20% of boils finish, (c) the limits of the middle 95% of times, symmetrical about the mean.
(a) Upper 5% point from the percentage points table, \(p=0.05\): \(\dfrac{t-240}{15}=1.6449\Rightarrow t=240+1.6449\times15=264.67=\) 264.7 s
(b) 20% below means 20% of the area is to the left, so \(z\) is negative. The table gives 0.8416 for \(p=0.2\): \(\dfrac{t-240}{15}=-0.8416\Rightarrow t=240-0.8416\times15=227.38=\) 227.4 s
(c) The middle 95% leaves 2.5% in each tail; \(p=0.025\) gives \(z=1.9600\). So \(240\pm1.96\times15\), giving 210.6 s to 269.4 s
Write the equation in the form \(\dfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma}=z\) with the sign of \(z\) already decided, then solve. A quick check: if the value you find is on the wrong side of the mean for the area you shaded, the sign of \(z\) is wrong.
How do you find an unknown mean or standard deviation?
A statement such as \(P(X\gt92)=0.0228\) tells you how far 92 is from the mean in standard deviations: it gives the \(z\)-value of 92. Writing \(\dfrac{92-\mu}{\sigma}=z\) gives one equation, and one equation is enough for one unknown.
Two habits make this reliable. First, turn the given probability into "area to the left" before reading the \(\Phi\) table in reverse: \(P(X\gt92)=0.0228\) means \(\Phi(z)=0.9772\). Second, check whether the probability is in the percentage points table (0.1, 0.05, 0.01, …): if it is, use that exact \(z\)-value.
The random variable \(X\sim N(80,\sigma^2)\). Given that \(P(X\gt92)=0.0228\), find (a) the value of \(\sigma\), (b) \(P(X\lt74)\).
(a) The area to the left of 92 is \(1-0.0228=0.9772\). Reading the \(\Phi\) table in reverse, \(\Phi(z)=0.9772\Rightarrow z=2.00\). So \(\dfrac{92-80}{\sigma}=2.00\Rightarrow\) \(\sigma=6\)
(b) Standardise with the value just found: \(P\!\left(Z\lt\frac{74-80}{6}\right)=P(Z\lt-1)=1-0.8413=0.1587=\) 0.159 (3 s.f.)
The volume of liquid in a small bottle is \(V\) ml, where \(V\sim N(\mu,0.8^2)\). Exactly 10% of bottles contain less than 20 ml. Find \(\mu\).
10% is below 20 ml, so 20 is below the mean and its \(z\)-value is negative. Percentage points table, \(p=0.1\): \(\dfrac{20-\mu}{0.8}=-1.2816\).
Solve: \(\mu=20+1.2816\times0.8=21.02528=\) 21.03 ml (4 s.f.)
Check: the mean is above 20 ml, as it must be when only 10% of bottles are below 20 ml.
Writing \(\dfrac{20-\mu}{0.8}=+1.2816\) and getting \(\mu=18.97\), below 20. Then 90% of bottles would be below 20 ml, not 10%. The sign of \(z\) comes from the sketch.
How do you find the mean and the standard deviation together?
With two unknowns you need two probability statements. Each one gives an equation of the form \(x-\mu=z\sigma\). Write both as \[\mu+z_1\sigma=x_1,\qquad \mu+z_2\sigma=x_2,\] then subtract to eliminate \(\mu\): \(\sigma=\dfrac{x_2-x_1}{z_2-z_1}\). There is a nice way to see this: the gap between the two values, measured in standard deviations, is \(z_2-z_1\), and the same gap in the units of \(x\) is \(x_2-x_1\). Dividing one by the other gives the size of one standard deviation.
Always check the result: \(\sigma\) must come out positive, and \(\mu\) should lie on the correct side of each given value.
The length \(L\) cm of a leaf from a species of shrub is modelled by a Normal distribution. 30% of leaves are shorter than 17 cm and 10% are longer than 25 cm. Find the mean and the standard deviation of \(L\).
Both probabilities are in the percentage points table. 17 is in the lower tail, so its \(z\) is negative: \[\frac{17-\mu}{\sigma}=-0.5244,\qquad \frac{25-\mu}{\sigma}=1.2816.\]
Rearrange and subtract: \(\mu-0.5244\sigma=17\) and \(\mu+1.2816\sigma=25\), so \(1.8060\sigma=8\).
\(\sigma=4.43\) cm, \(\mu=17+0.5244\times4.4297\ldots=19.3\) cm (3 s.f.)
Keep the unrounded \(\sigma=4.4297\ldots\) in the calculator when finding \(\mu\).
The time \(T\) minutes for a ferry crossing is modelled by a Normal distribution with mean \(\mu\) and standard deviation \(\sigma\). Records show that 6.68% of crossings take less than 36 minutes and 0.62% take more than 52 minutes. (a) Show that \(\sigma=4\) and find \(\mu\). (b) Find \(P(40\lt T\lt48)\). (c) A crossing has already lasted 44 minutes. Find the probability that it lasts more than 48 minutes. (d) The operator wants to state a time that 99% of crossings finish within. Find this time.
(a) Turn both statements into areas to the left and read the \(\Phi\) table in reverse. \(\Phi(z)=1-0.0668=0.9332\Rightarrow z=1.50\); 36 is in the lower tail, so its \(z\)-value is \(-1.50\). \(\Phi(z)=1-0.0062=0.9938\Rightarrow z=2.50\) for 52. Two equations: \(\mu-1.5\sigma=36\) and \(\mu+2.5\sigma=52\). Subtract: \(4\sigma=16\), so \(\sigma=4\), \(\mu=42\)
(b) Standardise both ends: \(P(-0.5\lt Z\lt1.5)=0.9332-(1-0.6915)=0.6247=\) 0.625 (3 s.f.)
(c) Conditional probability; more than 48 already implies more than 44: \[P(T\gt48\mid T\gt44)=\frac{P(T\gt48)}{P(T\gt44)}=\frac{1-\Phi(1.5)}{1-\Phi(0.5)}=\frac{0.0668}{0.3085}=\] 0.217 (3 s.f.)
(d) 1% above the stated time, so \(p=0.01\) in the percentage points table: \(t=42+2.3263\times4=51.31=\) 51.3 minutes
In part (a) the result is printed, so the working has to be complete: both \(z\)-values with their signs, both equations, and the solution.
When the probability given is not one of the percentage points, write down the table value you used and the \(z\) you read: "\(\Phi(z)=0.9938\), \(z=2.50\)". Showing the look-up is part of the method.
Exam tips for S1.6
A small bell curve with the mean marked and the required area shaded takes seconds and settles the two decisions where slips happen: "\(\Phi\) or \(1-\Phi\)?" and "is \(z\) positive or negative?".
Write \(P(X\gt33)=P\!\left(Z\gt\frac{33-30}{2.5}\right)\) with the numbers substituted, then quote the table value to 4 d.p. If a later step goes wrong, this line still shows the method.
For probabilities such as 0.1, 0.05, 0.025 and 0.01, the percentage points table gives \(z\) to 4 d.p. (1.2816, 1.6449, 1.9600, 2.3263). Reading the \(\Phi\) table backwards for these gives a less accurate \(z\).
Before you standardise, write \(\sigma=\ldots\) on its own. \(N(\mu,25)\) has \(\sigma=5\); \(N(\mu,5^2)\) is the same distribution.
A probability must lie between 0 and 1; a tail beyond \(z=2\) is small (about 0.02); a value with more than half the distribution below it lies above the mean. A value of \(\sigma\) you find must be positive.
Common misconceptions
| Misconception | Why it is wrong | Correct idea |
|---|---|---|
| In \(N(50,16)\) the standard deviation is 16. | The second parameter is the variance. | \(\sigma=\sqrt{16}=4\). |
| \(\Phi(-1.2)\) can be read from the table. | The table only lists \(z\ge0\). | \(\Phi(-1.2)=1-\Phi(1.2)\), by symmetry. |
| \(P(X\le33)\) is different from \(P(X\lt33)\). | \(X\) is continuous, so \(P(X=33)=0\). | The two are equal; no continuity correction is needed in S1. |
| The percentage points table gives the area to the left of \(z\). | It gives the probability above \(z\). | \(P(Z\gt z)=p\); for a lower-tail value use \(-z\). |
| A \(z\)-value is a probability. | \(z\) is a number of standard deviations and can be negative or bigger than 1. | The probability is the area \(\Phi(z)\), between 0 and 1. |
| Two probabilities are needed to find \(\mu\) when \(\sigma\) is known. | One equation is enough for one unknown. | One probability per unknown: one for \(\mu\) or \(\sigma\), two for both. |
How this topic connects
S1 probability and discrete random variables
Conditional probability, "at least one" and independent repeats all reappear here, applied to Normal areas. The mean and variance of a Normal variable mean the same as \(E(X)\) and \(\text{Var}(X)\) for a discrete one.
S2 approximations and hypothesis tests
In S2 the Normal distribution approximates the binomial and the Poisson distributions for large parameters, with a continuity correction (S2.3), and is used to carry out the tests that follow (S2.4). The formula for the Normal probability density function is not needed in S1, and neither are continuous random variables defined by a density function (S2.2).
P1 transformations of graphs
\(X=\mu+\sigma Z\) corresponds to a stretch of the standard curve by factor \(\sigma\) parallel to the \(x\)-axis (with a stretch by factor \(1/\sigma\) parallel to the \(y\)-axis, so the area stays 1) followed by a translation of \(\mu\) — the change of shape seen in the second figure. In IAL Physics practical work, repeated readings scatter roughly symmetrically about a central value, which is why their mean is taken as the best estimate.
Key formulae
| Formula | Use | In the formulae list? |
|---|---|---|
| \(X\sim N(\mu,\sigma^2)\) | notation: mean \(\mu\), variance \(\sigma^2\) | No – learn it |
| \(Z=\dfrac{X-\mu}{\sigma}\), \(Z\sim N(0,1^2)\) | standardising any Normal variable | No – learn it |
| \(\Phi(z)=P(Z\lt z)\) | cumulative probabilities for \(z\ge0\) | Yes (table) |
| \(P(Z\gt z)=p\) | percentage points: the \(z\)-value for a given upper-tail probability | Yes (table) |
| \(\Phi(-z)=1-\Phi(z)\), \(P(Z\gt z)=1-\Phi(z)\) | negative \(z\) and upper tails | No – derive it (symmetry) |
| \(P(a\lt X\lt b)=\Phi(z_b)-\Phi(z_a)\) | probability between two values | No – derive it |
| \(x=\mu+z\sigma\) | value from a probability; equations for unknown \(\mu\), \(\sigma\) | No – derive it |
| \(P(A\mid B)=\dfrac{P(A\cap B)}{P(B)}\) | conditional probabilities with Normal tails | Yes |
Check your understanding
1. \(X\sim N(50,16)\). State the standard deviation of \(X\) and the value of \(P(X\gt50)\).
\(\sigma=\sqrt{16}=4\). The curve is symmetrical about the mean 50, so \(P(X\gt50)=0.5\).
2. Find \(P(Z\gt-1.15)\).
By symmetry, \(P(Z\gt-1.15)=P(Z\lt1.15)=\Phi(1.15)=0.8749\).
3. \(X\sim N(12,0.5^2)\). Find \(P(X\lt11.3)\).
\(z=\dfrac{11.3-12}{0.5}=-1.4\), so \(P=1-\Phi(1.4)=1-0.9192=0.0808\).
4. Find the value of \(a\) such that \(P(Z\lt a)=0.01\).
Only 1% is below \(a\), so \(a\) is negative. The percentage points table gives 2.3263 for \(p=0.01\), so \(a=-2.3263\).
5. \(X\sim N(\mu,5^2)\) and \(P(X\lt70)=0.9\). Find \(\mu\).
10% is above 70, so \(\dfrac{70-\mu}{5}=1.2816\) and \(\mu=70-6.408=63.6\) (3 s.f.).
6. IQ-style test scores are modelled by \(X\sim N(100,15^2)\). Find the proportion of scores above 120.
\(z=\dfrac{120-100}{15}=1.333\ldots\), which rounds to 1.33 for the table. \(P(X\gt120)=1-\Phi(1.33)=1-0.9082=0.0918\) (3 s.f.). A calculator gives 0.0912; either is acceptable as a table/calculator value.
Specification checklist
- (S1 6.1) I can describe the shape of a Normal distribution, use its symmetry about the mean, and explain what changing \(\mu\) or \(\sigma\) does to the curve.
- (S1 6.1) I know that in \(N(\mu,\sigma^2)\) the second parameter is the variance.
- (S1 6.1) I can standardise a Normal variable with \(Z=\dfrac{X-\mu}{\sigma}\).
- (S1 6.1) I can use the table of \(\Phi(z)\), with symmetry, to find probabilities below, above and between values, including for negative \(z\).
- (S1 6.1) I can use the percentage points table, or the \(\Phi\) table in reverse, to find a value with a given probability above or below it.
- (S1 6.1) I can find an unknown mean or an unknown standard deviation from one given probability.
- (S1 6.1) I can find both the mean and the standard deviation by solving simultaneous equations.
- (S1 6.1) I can combine Normal probabilities with conditional probability and with independent repeated observations.